 |
Is laminar (unidirectional) air flow necessary
in a Compounding Aseptic Isolator? |
 |
Yes. The location of “first air” that is necessary
for good aseptic technique is well defined in a laminar flow isolator.
The laminar air flow ensures that particles generated by compounding
are quickly swept away from critical sites and captured immediately
on HEPA filters as not to contaminate the next preparation. This
is proven to be the safest air flow available for compounding. |
 |
Is it necessary to HEPA filter the air in the antechamber
/ airlock of a Compounding Aseptic Isolator? |
 |
Absolutely, it is the only way to ensure that dirty room air
does not enter the clean work area. Keeping the clean condition
of the work area intact helps speed productivity and allows for
materials to be brought into the work area without compromising
the safety of preparations already inside. |
 |
How can operators be made more comfortable while using
a Compounding Aseptic Isolator? |
 |
Comfort and productivity go hand in hand. A Compounding Aseptic Isolator
should be designed to meet the needs of a wide variety of body types.
Workstations should be adjustable for users of differing heights
and the viewing panel should be slanted to allow users to lean into
their work. Gloveports should be as large as possible and oriented
to accommodate a relaxed arm position for users of varied shoulder
widths. A Compounding Aseptic Isolator should allow for the use of hand size
specific, gloves to provide maximum dexterity, tactility and comfort.
Models that allow for use of the disposable gloves you already use
are more cost effective. Foot rests, arm rests and adjustable chairs
also add to operator comfort. |
 |
Can I use a Compounding Aseptic Isolator for compounding hazardous
drugs? |
 |
Yes, if operated under negative pressure. It is recommended (by
the NIOSH alert) that all exhaust from the unit be vented to the
outside to reduce the chance of operator exposure to the hazards
being compounded. It is also recommended that the air within the
work area not be recirculated as it can lead to a build up of vapor
increasing chances of exposure. Strong negative pressures will also
work to protect the operator if a glove gets punctured or falls
off. Ideally, the air should move away from the breathing zone of
the operator even if a whole sleeve falls off the viewing panel. |
 |
Can I use a Compounding Aseptic Isolator instead of a cleanroom for
compounding sterile preparations? |
 |
Compounding Aseptic Isolators using laminar (unidirectional) airflow function
just like a cleanroom. The HEPA filtered antechamber / airlock acts
like the cleanroom buffer zone. USP <797> revision puts the
onus on the manufacturer to recommend if their Compounding Aseptic Isolator
design can be used outside of a cleanroom. The manufacturer should
be able to show that materials can be brought in and out of the
unit without compromising the cleanliness / sterility of the work
area. |
 |
Can I configure a Compounding Aseptic Isolator to suit my individual
needs? |
 |
A modular Compounding Aseptic Isolator will allow for antechambers / airlocks
to be placed on left, right or even both sides. Work area sizes
should be variable to accommodate autocompounders or even two operators.
Units that have been designed to be forward compliant with existing
and proposed regulations are the most cost effective. The wider
the variety of options the Compounding Aseptic Isolator has the more options
you have. |
 |
I know that there are proposed revisions to USP <797>.
Is it true that Compounding Aseptic Isolators will have to be kept in a cleanroom
once the new regulations are passed? |
 |
The proposed revisions to USP <797> specifically
mention the placement of Compounding Aseptic Isolators: “Barrier isolators
are located, operated, and used according to manufacturers' recommendations.”
(Proposed
Revisions to USP Chapter <797> Pharmaceutical Compounding
– Sterile Preparations from www.USP.org) This answer is
relatively vague. A better explanation of the revision was put forth
by Clyde Buchanan: “USP 797 does not require that an isolator
be located in a buffer room. But the cleaner the environment surrounding
an isolator, the less likely unsterile particles will be taken into
the isolator through the transfer port. Personnel using an isolator
do not have to be garbed since isolator technology separates the
person from the product; still, a cleanroom gown will lower the
particles generated by a person into the environment.” (Q&A
on USP Chapter 797 with Clyde Buchanan – from www.ASHP.org)
|
 |
Why is it recommended that I rotate disinfectants?
Is there not one product that can effectively be used every time? |
 |
There is a widely held belief that rotating disinfectants
prevents organisms from developing a resistance to any one compound.
In a recent article Elaine Kopis Sartain dispelled this idea and
explained: “What actually happens is that either an ineffective
chemistry (e.g., alcohol against spore-forming microorganisms) is
applied or suboptimal concentrations or contact times are used,
so that the expected disinfection performance is not achieved. If
one continues with a microbial control program that kills only certain
organisms (e.g. vegetative bacteria) while having no impact on others
(e.g. spore-formers) then eventually the program does exactly what
it has inadvertently been designed to do—select for specific
organisms that are inherently resistant to, and cannot be controlled
by, the disinfectant technology being applied.” (Regulatory
Update, Elaine Kopis Sartain, March 2005 – from www.a2c2.com) |